Re: Details about CoI - Re: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF

Hi all,

Am 02.06.22 um 16:14 schrieb Emiliano Vavassori:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it is just fair to add some small details about the how a CoI
> should be processed as food for thoughts and only for the sake of the
> argument.
>
> Il 02/06/22 12:32, Jan Holesovsky ha scritto:
> > > Thus I'd
> > > expect that this CoI should be solved asap and the appropriate
> > > measures
> > > taken  to prevent TDF from further damage.
> >
> > Are you, a TDF non-member, actually asking me, an _elected_ Board
> > Member, to step down?  That is a very ridiculous demand.
>
> Removing a CoI does *not* need to result in a stepping down of a
> director, nor there is the provision to do so. The Rules of Procedures
> for the Board of Directors [1] and specifically the 1.3.2 version of
> the CoI Policy that was amended just this year and that is linked at
> that page are some nice starting points.
in some cases it could be solved with some smaller steps,
But the board in total (and every directory in person) take the
responsibility for the whole budget and every budget item. And if there
is a CoI regarding the budget, the appropriate measure would be the step
down. There is no possibility of 'cherry picking' regarding budget items
for any of the directors.

Regards,
Andreas

--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy