Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 27/05/2022 12:31, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Paolo, all,

Paolo Vecchi wrote:
That document clearly contains another proposal which should go its own way
instead of trying to make it pass as a "merged" proposal.

The intention here (and I would very much like to support that idea),
is to come up with a merged proposal, which then gets broad support.

Broad support by whom?

Up until Collabora Productivity's general manager came out with his own proposal there wasn't much effort being put in it by others in the board.

If there's changes you believe are problematic, please interact with
As above the changes makes it a completely different proposal, just rename it.

Process-wise, my call to work out a proposal how to come to a joint
text (in a small circle) is still open.

I've asked many times but still no answer. Will you one day explain why you keep wanting to have this process behind closed doors?

Having the two sides that are apparently the furthest apart, telling
each other the text is not ok for the foreseeable future - is not my
idea of a working process.

For 3 months there were no sides. The community contributed to the project and once it was ready the representative of a commercial contributor decided to propose a new document.

It's quite clear that there are 2 proposals now as the changes proposed completely change the initial one.


-- Thorsten



To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.