Re: [board-discuss] Merged proposal for in-house developers at TDF

Hi,

On 27/05/2022 12:31, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Hi Paolo, all,
>
> Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> > That document clearly contains another proposal which should go its own way
> > instead of trying to make it pass as a "merged" proposal.
> The intention here (and I would very much like to support that idea),
> is to come up with a merged proposal, which then gets broad support.

Broad support by whom?

Up until Collabora Productivity's general manager came out with his own 
proposal there wasn't much effort being put in it by others in the board.

> If there's changes you believe are problematic, please interact with
> them.
As above the changes makes it a completely different proposal, just 
rename it.
> Process-wise, my call to work out a proposal how to come to a joint
> text (in a small circle) is still open.

I've asked many times but still no answer. Will you one day explain why 
you keep wanting to have this process behind closed doors?


> Having the two sides that are apparently the furthest apart, telling
> each other the text is not ok for the foreseeable future - is not my
> idea of a working process.

For 3 months there were no sides. The community contributed to the 
project and once it was ready the representative of a commercial 
contributor decided to propose a new document.

It's quite clear that there are 2 proposals now as the changes proposed 
completely change the initial one.

> Cheers,
>
> -- Thorsten

Ciao

Paolo


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy