Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Paolo, all,

Paolo Vecchi wrote:
That document clearly contains another proposal which should go its own way
instead of trying to make it pass as a "merged" proposal.

The intention here (and I would very much like to support that idea),
is to come up with a merged proposal, which then gets broad support.

If there's changes you believe are problematic, please interact with

Process-wise, my call to work out a proposal how to come to a joint
text (in a small circle) is still open.

Having the two sides that are apparently the furthest apart, telling
each other the text is not ok for the foreseeable future - is not my
idea of a working process.


-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.