Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Am 25.05.22 um 10:05 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Hi Andreas, all,

Andreas Mantke wrote:
It seemed there is a approach behind this behavior: postpone the whole
topic as far as possible. And try to frustrate the members who try to
drive this topic forward. And prevent this project in the end or to vary
it that it will not disturb own interests or support them.

I don't think that's a fair conclusion of what's happening.
No problem: you could think so. But it looks in my  opinion different if
you are not group insider.

To me, Michael Weghorn's explanation appears much closer to the
truth. After all, whatever proposal will be there to vote on, needs
the backing of as many board members as possible - it is therefore
very important to work out a consensus.

It seemed that there is suddenly a new constrative approach on the
mailing list. Thus the board needs to first clarify, if it really wants
to hire two in-house developers or another developer mentor.

I see no initiative from the leadership of the board to active work on a
consensus about the approach and the document. Maybe there are a lot of
activity behind the scene.


## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog:

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.