Re: [board-discuss] Proposal for in-house developers at TDF

Hi,

On 25/05/2022 10:19, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Hi Paolo, hi Kendy,
>
> I wrote:
> > Could I ask the two of you to work out a joint proposal, how to
> > finalize the document?
> >
> > It could be a working group or a shared, editable document, or
> > something else entirely - but would be great to see this finished
> > soonish, and with wide board support.
> To reiterate the question, is that something the two of you would be
> willing to collaborate on?
It seems like you missed my previous answer:

https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00530.html

I've been willing to work together with anyone in a transparent and 
public way.

I've been waiting for Kendy to propose improvements for the past 3 
months but I'm yet to receive some.

I guess that if Kendy hasn't proposed improvements in 3 months he's 
probably satisfied of the progress so why do you keep pushing him?

> The other option I see, is to select a small working group (board and
> perhaps community members) during the next board call, with the
> mission to synthesize a 3rd, new proposal from all input received so
> far.

Why are you once again proposing a small group to do things behind 
closed doors?
Could you explain the rationale?

Why are you saying that now we have to create a 3rd proposal?

Then as far as I can see there is 1 proposal to employ two developers 
and suddenly a new proposal appeared to employ 1 mentor, what is the 3rd 
one for?

> Cheers,
>
> -- Thorsten
Ciao

Paolo

--
Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature