Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 20:27 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
it may be good to know why there are the need for two members from
one ecosystem company? Has no other individual contributors or
ecosystem system members shown interest to participate in the ESC?

The ESC should represent a wide diversity of the ecosystem and the
interests of its members (individual and organizations). Thus every
organization (aside maybe from TDF) should only hold one seat in the

The text of proposed changes is a diff against the current list
available in the link at the top of the original mail, just in case the
text reads as if the proposed changes are the full ESC complement.
There is (and here proposed to still be) 5 TDF employees, 5 Collabora,
3 allotropia, 3 Red Hat and 6 other Individual or single company
employees on the ESC giving IMO a fairly broad representation of
ESC-relevant skills and insights. I wouldn't welcome dropping 8 (or 12)
members and lose out on that.

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.