On 10/02/2022 16.31, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 2/10/22 13:36, Michael Weghorn wrote:
Of course, in case the main intention were for TDF to provide more
business-like services (like an LTS version or creating an impression
of "donate a certain amount of money and your pet bug will be
fixed"), I see very well how that might interfere significantly with
the business model of ecosystem companies.
Totally agree. But I don't see the issue, as ESC and BoD members could
easily stop any project before it starts, when there is a potential
risk of conflict. AFAIK, major development activities are scrutinized
by both bodies, as they are ranked in order of importance, suggested,
approved and transformed to tenders, or not considered for tendering.
I totally agree, extending that process to cover significant tasks
that internal developers would work on may be a solution.
Development activities which are not considered for tendering, or just
ignored, could probably be developed by TDF without creating
disruptions (or even discussions).
To double-check nobody is "secretly" working on that as well or is
planning to do so, discussing/mentioning larger items first certainly
won't hurt.
(But that doesn't only apply for work done by TDF developers; e.g. the
weekly ESC call already has a "What’s cooking" section where that
would fit well.)
I am rather sure that in 7 million lines of code (plus the open bugs)
there are enough challenges for everyone.
Definitely!
Of course, given my complete lack of understanding of development, is
too easy to find a technical angle to disprove what I just wrote,
[...]
At least from my developer's perspective, I totally agree with what you
wrote.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.