Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 2/10/22 17:27, Jan Holesovsky wrote:

Yes, but it looks like the discussion is blocked one step before
reaching a consensus on this very simple point. If the discussion
as such, I have to say that I don't feel I am represented - as a TDF
Member - by any member of the just elected board of directors (of
course, those who have expressed their opinions).

This is very sad to hear :-(  I am afraid this is a product of the
unilateral & vigorous presentation of hiring developers as the only way
forward, regardless of what the ecosystem companies have to say.

I disagree. This is the result of BoD members pointing fingers to each other without even trying to start a discussion and reach consensus.

I would have applauded a reaction to the message that has opened this thread which was integrating the proposal with some additional thoughts and suggestions, to specify which could be the areas where a developer hired by TDF could work for the common benefit of the project.

Sorry, but I haven't seen anything like this so far.
Italo Vignoli - LibreOffice Marketing & PR
mobile/signal +39.348.5653829 - email
GPG Key ID - 0xAAB8D5C0
DB75 1534 3FD0 EA5F 56B5 FDA6 DE82 934C AAB8 D5C0

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.