Re: [board-discuss] Drafting Tender "Cleanup & further improve ODF conformance"

hi Florian,

On 03.02.22 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> the below mail is a bit older - Christmas break and some other tenders 
> came in between, so I get to this only now.
>
> Florian Effenberger wrote on 01.12.21 at 15:30:

> > > (2)
> > > The search result from item "Required 2." contains Meta-issues. 
> > > Expanding them results in 80 issues.
> > >
> > > Using Whiteboard as search criteria has no advantage compared to the 
> > > Meta-issues. And I think both, Whitheboard search or Meta-issues, are 
> > > not suitable for a tender, but a tender needs to list the issues 
> > > explicitly.
> > >
> > > The list from Whiteboard search and Meta-issues needs to be examined 
> > > and prioritized manually.
> >
> > This is taken from the specification at 
> > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Budget2021#Cleanup_.26_further_improve_ODF_conformance 
> >
> >
> > I fear answering that question is beyond my skills. ;-) Does it make 
> > sense to bounce this question back to the ESC for further specification?
>
> Regina (thanks a lot!) sent a list of bugs back in December on the dev 
> mailing list: 
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2021-December/088210.html 
>
>
> Was there any further discussion or feedback on this? If the list 
> mentioned there is fine, I replace item 2 from the tender with it. If 
> we're unsure whether that meets the budget or not, as the person days 
> are listed in the tender, we can add a note along the lines of "Please 
> propose a subset and prioritization of these bugs, that do not exceed 
> the person days factored in for this tender, see below."

thanks for reminding me, due to too much vacation i forgot but now i 
just provided some feedback about some of the issues to Regina.

i haven't thought about how much time the selected issues would require 
yet, it's possible it might still be more than the budget which the BoD 
wants to spend, so i guess a fixed budget and then apply for a subset of 
the issues makes sense.

> > Michael Stahl wrote on 03.11.21 at 10:49:
> >
> > > the scope of this is quite large and unclear... *required* items are:
> > >
> > > 1. ODFAutoTests: addressing issues will be difficult because as 
> > > Regina points out the web service appears to be offline.
> > >    IIRC it's possible to run the tests offline, but currently i guess 
> > > nobody knows how much work it is to set that up and what problems 
> > > would actually be found, so i guess this item mostly amounts to "get 
> > > ODFAutoTests to run at all".
> >
> > I've tried to rephrase #1 a bit, let me know if this is better.
>
> Is the current wording fine?

i guess, as long as nobody interprets it to mean "set up a public 
website" :)


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy