On 03.02.22 14:30, Florian Effenberger wrote:
the below mail is a bit older - Christmas break and some other tenders
came in between, so I get to this only now.
Florian Effenberger wrote on 01.12.21 at 15:30:
The search result from item "Required 2." contains Meta-issues.
Expanding them results in 80 issues.
Using Whiteboard as search criteria has no advantage compared to the
Meta-issues. And I think both, Whitheboard search or Meta-issues, are
not suitable for a tender, but a tender needs to list the issues
The list from Whiteboard search and Meta-issues needs to be examined
and prioritized manually.
This is taken from the specification at
I fear answering that question is beyond my skills. ;-) Does it make
sense to bounce this question back to the ESC for further specification?
Regina (thanks a lot!) sent a list of bugs back in December on the dev
Was there any further discussion or feedback on this? If the list
mentioned there is fine, I replace item 2 from the tender with it. If
we're unsure whether that meets the budget or not, as the person days
are listed in the tender, we can add a note along the lines of "Please
propose a subset and prioritization of these bugs, that do not exceed
the person days factored in for this tender, see below."
thanks for reminding me, due to too much vacation i forgot but now i
just provided some feedback about some of the issues to Regina.
i haven't thought about how much time the selected issues would require
yet, it's possible it might still be more than the budget which the BoD
wants to spend, so i guess a fixed budget and then apply for a subset of
the issues makes sense.
Michael Stahl wrote on 03.11.21 at 10:49:
the scope of this is quite large and unclear... *required* items are:
1. ODFAutoTests: addressing issues will be difficult because as
Regina points out the web service appears to be offline.
IIRC it's possible to run the tests offline, but currently i guess
nobody knows how much work it is to set that up and what problems
would actually be found, so i guess this item mostly amounts to "get
ODFAutoTests to run at all".
I've tried to rephrase #1 a bit, let me know if this is better.
Is the current wording fine?
i guess, as long as nobody interprets it to mean "set up a public
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy