Hi,
the linked documents shows the different behavior / narrative during a
period without a commercial product and with the opposite.
During the first one it is a community project and it is one of the core
projects. It is welcomed that every community member (everyone)
contributes to the project, support it and use it for free (as product
of the community). It is also proposed that it will be supported as a
community project and get updates (etc.).
Once the project gets commercial ready this commitment was retracted.
And the speech changed to the statement that the project had only little
/ negligible contributions from the community.
If you analyze this statement you could get to the conclusion that the
contributions of one group of developers are not contributions to the
community. But if that would be the case, why could they apply for TDF
membership and so on?
And the statement, that Paolo linked in this thread, was made from TDF
in 2015 and you could find out who was on the board at that time:
https://www.documentfoundation.org/governance/board/2014-2016/
Thus it seemed very important to have clear rules for projects, that TDF
hosts and which were substantial driven by a professional entity.
And it's also obvious that a CoI could happen very likely, if one try to
wear two hats (on different sides of the table).
Regards,
Andreas
Am 21.01.22 um 19:10 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
And also:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160320072620/https://www.collaboraoffice.com/community-news/libreoffice-online-questions-answered-what-who-how-and-when/
Maybe also that gave some people the impression that LibreOffice
OnLine, being hosted at TDF and "contributed to the LibreOffice
project", would have been made available to all but that may just be
my reading.
Ciao
Paolo
On 21/01/2022 18:31, Michael Meeks wrote:
On 18/01/2022 06:39, Andreas Mantke wrote:
only for background information I recommend to read:
blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2015/01/27/the-document-foundation-announces-the-results-of-the-android-tender/
and e.g. the annual report 2013 of TDF, page 9/10
And also:
https://collaboraonline.github.io/post/faq/#mobile-story
which has links to the reports, with the (core) commits. And:
https://collaboraonline.github.io/post/faq/#creators
may be interesting too; all of that a year+ old.
ATB,
Michael.
--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
- Re: [board-discuss] Counterproposal to the "actization" of LibreOffice Online (continued)
Re: [board-discuss] Counterproposal to the "actization" of LibreOffice Online · Cor Nouws
Re: [board-discuss] Counterproposal to the "actization" of LibreOffice Online · Paolo Vecchi
Re: [board-discuss] Counterproposal to the "actization" of LibreOffice Online · Cor Nouws
Re: [board-discuss] Counterproposal to the "actization" of LibreOffice Online · Michael Meeks
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.