Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2022 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 09/01/2022 17:27, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
Both sentences imply that the ESC have in praxis a blocking veto, independent of the decision by a board, for both procedures.

In general, I think it is wise when (re-)starting an engineering project to get input from the engineering community who are represented in the ESC.

Of course, the board is not obliged to do so, and it also appoints the ESC itself. If necessary it can stack it with yes-people.

However, I would really suggest that making engineering decisions against the advice of the leaders of the teams that do the work is something that should give very serious pause for thought & consideration by a board.

Or something like this. I am not sure if it is good to vote on it without clarification of this item in any case. What do you think?

Clearly the board as the ultimately authority has many avenues to ensure its will is done: changing the policy, changing the ESC composition, etc.

But as a general scheme of action for a peaceful and sensible approach to the problem, I think the policy as proposed is fine.



-- <><, GM Collabora Productivity
Hangout:, Skype: mmeeks
(M) +44 7795 666 147 - timezone usually UK / Europe

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.