Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Florian,

On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 at 12:23:22 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Result of vote: 3 approvals, 3 disapprovals, 1 abstain.
One deputy approves, one deputy disapproves.

As the vote is a tied vote, § 9 IV of the statutes come to effect. The
Chairperson has the deciding vote, and voted +1 to the proposal.

Decision: The request has been accepted.
This message is to be archived by the BoD members and their deputies.

AFAICT this outcome stems from the fact there it was a yes/no type of
vote, so yays “for a short-term period” (quoting Lothar, but there were
other BoD members with that understanding) were counted alongside
enthusiastic yays.

Given the short-term period isn't binding, in practice the vote might be
interpreted as a definitive +1.  Could the BoD clarify the short-term
period and maybe even commit to revisit the vote say, before the end of
their term?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.