On 09/07/2020 14:48 Paolo Vecchi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
thanks for your feedback and see inline my comments.
On 09/07/2020 19:41, Kev M wrote:
> > It would be better to call it "LibreOffice Unsupported" and "LibreOffice Paid
Support" instead of using the terms "LibreOffice Enterprise" and "LibreOffice Personal".
> Note that we are talking about adding a tag line, if the Community agrees, and that you
are very welcome to propose the tag line you would like to LibreOffice which, apart from the
tag line, won't change in anything else.
As described in the proposed marketing plan, in the communication we sent out Monday and on
various channels there won't be any product called "LibreOffice Enterprise" coming out of TDF,
that's only a collective name we are proposing for the members of the ecosystem.
You're arguing that using the term "community" creates confusion because of other open
source projects providing the same tagging. But some of those projects also use "Enterprise" to
describe their paid versions, and those versions have different features than their community
editions. So I don't get the argument that allowing for the "Enterprise" tag is OK, but a
"Community" tag is not.
> Once again there won't be any "Enterprise" tag in any version of LibreOffice.
Community makes sense to us as we are the LibreOffice Community and I also like it as
potential additional tag for LibreOffice but...
out there, for people that don't know anything about Open Source communities, the term
community means something else like a help group that helps you kicking the habit.
It's like FLOSS, we know what it means but my kids find it annoying. It seems like they
prefer to go to the dentist than flossing their teeth ;-)
I've read and understand the context of the marketing plan, as well as Michael's
article on business models. I understand the intent; but there is uncertainty about LibreOffice
as a sustainable project as is being alluded to by Michael and other ecosystem partners and
this is being used as a veiled threat to introduce changes that haven't received proper
community consultation. A statement by TDF saying there is no plan to do these things, while
continuing to discuss moving to an edition system, is the left hand washing the car while the
right hand throws dirt --- or some better idiom than this.
> We are tasked to propose and promote changes that help sustaining/growing the Community
which develops LibreOffice.
You, being part of the Community, have the right and the duty to do the same and to stand for
election next time so that you can propose your ideas to the Board, you can do it also now
without being in the Board BTW, discuss them, see if they make sense, and then propose them to
the Community. This is what we are doing now.
AFAIK Michael complains and says that we are all doomed every so often but when he doesn't do
that he's a nice chap and a very valuable member of the Community. At least we have a wide range
of views ;-)
To point to links and mailing lists that anyone under the age of 40 probably does not
use regularly is not a good way to engage with your community. Several suggestions have been
made and it seems like certain people are resistant to them without giving legitimate reasons
beyond "this is always how we've done it, you should have checked instead. It's your fault for
not flooding your email inbox with chatter."
> One of the things I most hate is hearing/reading people saying "this is always how we've
done it", those are the people that keep doing the same stuff because are scared of change or
can't be arsed to change.
I'm over 40 and I've used/I'm using quite a number of communication channels, mailing lists
are not sexy but are still a decent tool for asynchronous communication that can be threaded.
Could you recommend other tools that could be even more efficient which would not make us
dependent on a third party and that really care about everyone's Privacy?
It's easy to use new toys that pop in and disappear after a few months or years but we think
that we should host as much as possible ourselves to satisfy even the most paranoid Privacy
activist (here I am) and archive our mailing list to be accountable.
Please do offer us your advice.
> > (There are 40 upvotes and 0 downvotes on this comment:
) Obviously how it's been done before is not working because people are upset and concerned
about the project. So I'd encourage some self-reflection in resisting calls to use modern
software infrastructure for the project to communicate better with stakeholders/donors beyond
those who have the privilege to be paid to work on the project.
> I read The Register (hi guys!) practically every day and I like the fact that there are a
lot of interesting and useful comments to articles.
Some comments with knowledge of what they are talking about some others may not have yet a
clear view of the issue.
The point is that I'm pleased that many came out to complain, got clarifications and now they
are contributing to improving the project.
Paolo Vecchi - Deputy Member of the Board of Directors
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy