Re: [board-discuss] How is TDC compelled to keep the user first?
On 2020-03-01 20:32, Brett Cornwall wrote:
I believe that Canonical is related here because, like TDC, the
proposal appears to be that a for-profit entity be given exclusive
rights to a trademark to a supposed community-owned product. Like TDC,
Canonical's founding idealized Shuttleworth's pessimism that free
software could survive without a for-profit entity as its protector.
Correction: Could *not* survive without a for-profit entity as its protector.
Description: PGP signature
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy