Re: [board-discuss] How is TDC compelled to keep the user first?
On 28.02.20 15:04, Brett Cornwall wrote:
Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created
underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and
Canonical are two living examples. Sacrifices to user empowerment are
off-topic, but: how is Canonical related to any non-profit?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_Ltd doesn't mention anything.
3. What assurances does TDF offer that assuage fears that the lifeblood
of LibreOffice will pivot from one of community involvement to one of
company culture (with community involvement as a PR spin)?
what exactly do you mean? the majority of bugfixes and new features
already come from developers employed by companies such as Red Hat,
Collabora, CIB, and this has been the case for most of the existence of
the project. of course most if not all of the developers employed by
these companies consider themselves members of the LO community, and why
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy