Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hello Andreas,

Andreas Mantke wrote:
it's your view on the statutes and the reasons for the rule about
affiliation. I don't share that.

independent of the reading of the statutes - what Franklin sent is just the representation statement. That per se does not trigger this conflict of interest rule.

Amongst a variety of other things, it depends on the actual meeting composition and the topics voted or discussed, so I propose to have that discussion when an actual representation takes place.

If there are concerns on the wording of the statement, happy to talk on the phone with you anytime.


Florian Effenberger, Executive Director (Geschäftsführer)
Tel: +49 30 5557992-50 | Mail:
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details:

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
Privacy Policy:


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.