On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:33 PM Thomas Meyer <email@example.com> wrote:
* it's really the situation of self dealing (you are sitting on both sides
of the same table).
No, as I am only a Board deputy rather than a full director, have not voted
on this proposal and will not do so at the Board meeting where the decision
We are a community of people with a commitment to free/open source software
in general and LibreOffice/Document Liberation in particular. You can find
a way almost everyone willing to serve here has a conflict in any positive
action we try to take. If you choose to.
So it could be regarded as a letterbox company.
Are you making an accusation here, it's not clear? Do you intend to make
the same accusation against other entities which do not trade from their
registered address, such as <checks notes> The Document Foundation?
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy