Re: [board-discuss] Format of the BoD votes announcement
On 01/02/2013 02:47 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
I'm wondering if this would cause a "group think" mentality within the
BoD. I know that if a name is public, being the only dissenter might
dissuade a current or future BoD from dissenting. Ultimately I'm
wondering how much adding names helps the project move forward. I know
that we adhere to a very open policy but with voting, sometimes
anonymous really encourages the best deliberation.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Tom Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
but there are times
when a vote needs to be taken anonymously.
Can you give a concrete example of such time ? I mean for a BoD vote.
note: there is a distinction between private deliberation, temporarily
non-public and 'anonymous' BoD vote.
I can think of cases where the 2 former are justified or necessary,
for privacy concern or legal reasons... but I can't think of a case
where the later would be justified.
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy