Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: [board-discuss] warrants for certain tasks


+1 . May I add my humble self for a liaison and membership budget
(membership fees to other orgs)?

Best,

-- 
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-Founder & Director, The Document Foundation,
Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint




2012/5/3 Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>

Hello,

since voting on each and every single expense during the BoD calls is a
bit tedious, but required by the statutes, I would like to propose an
alternative solution to make the daily operations a bit easier.

In a nutshell, I would like to have the board appoint responsibilities to
not only, but mainly, BoD members. As an example:

       - Thorsten and Florian for administrative issues
       - Alex (from the admin team) and Florian for infrastructure topics
       - Michael and Caolan for development resources
       - Italo for marketing projects

and so on. Every area gets a fixed budget, either per month, quarter or
year, and if the goals fit into the statutes, the tax law and the
foundation's objectives, upon approval of one of the responsible parties,
the money can be spent without the need to have a formal BoD vote.

Excluded should be long-term contracts and anything that is not part of
the daily operations, like entering 10 year contracts fors infrastructure,
signing exclusive advertising deals and so on - you get the point. ;-)

Real life examples: Signing the contract with a new domain registrar,
buying a bunch of new domain names, ordering the SMS gateway, or buying one
additional machine is something the board could leave at my discretion for
infrastructure. Making expenses for the tax advisor is something the board
could leave at Thorsten's discretion, and buying one development machine or
buying required software is something Michael and Caolan could decide.

Things like capital investments, trademark registrations, establishing a
certification program and other non-daily operations would still require
the approval of the full board.

While the above is no readily written proposal to formally vote upon and
issue warrants, what do you generally think about it? I think if we limit
the amount to a senseful value, and have the budget on the radar, this is
something that would ease our daily operations and give people a bit more
flexibility, so we can focus on work rather than administration.

The German FrODeV e.V. has a similar rule in their rules of procedure
("Geschäftsordnung"), but they forsee a "veto time" of four working days,
which I'd like to either shorten for TDF or even avoid at all.

By the way, this is something that should not go into our community bylaws
or the rules of procedure, since changing it then has some hurdles, so an
individual decision of the BoD that can be changed or revoked anytime makes
sense.

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger, Chairman of the Board
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: 
http://www.documentfoundation.**org/imprint<http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint>



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.