Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

RE: [board-discuss] Membership Committee

It is none of my business how TDF establishes its governance and qualifies its officials.

Just the same, I thought it strange that there was a question of any conflict seen in Drew Jensen's 
participation on Apache projects.

I want to say two things, because I have Drew in high regard and I want to be clear about where he 
stands in my perspective and also my sense of the ASF philosophy and policies.

First about the ASF.  The Apache Software Foundation celebrates diversity and multiplicity in the 
world of open-source development.  It is a matter of policy that forks, peers, siblings, 
descendents and ancestors are all just fine, open-, close-, and licensed in any manner.  Apache has 
its own licensing regime and development approach, but it has no issue with the preferences of 
other projects.  

Now, some individuals have their personal histories, hurts, mistakes, and grievances, whatever they 
happen to be.  But that is irrelevant to where ASF fulfills its charter to operation in the public 
interest.  The ASF has no issue with whatever associations its contributors have beyond their 
contribution to Apache projects.

Individuals have differences and choose to go their own way, to return, to diverge, to scratch 
their own itches in whatever manner works for them. I say ASF honors all of that.  

Secondly, I want to acknowledge Drew for his steady presence, especially in some timely moments in 
the run-up to the migration of the Forums under Apache hosting.  Whatever Drew 
chooses to do, and whether he finds continued participation on AOOo inconsistent with that or not, 
I want it known that Drew is always welcome at AOOo, as is anyone else here, and he can come and go 
as he pleases with all of our blessings and thanks.  There are no recriminations, there is no 
litmus test, and Drew will always be welcome to contribute in any manner he chooses.

'Nuff said?

-----Original Message-----
From: drew [] 
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 13:31
Subject: Re: [board-discuss] Membership Committee

Howdy Micheal, et al,

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 16:59 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
[ ... ]
      Having said that - we've sounded out previous appointees more
informally beforehand, which is perhaps harder here. Clearly this is a
responsible role, and part of our formal governance. As such, some may
have queries about your involvement with the Apache project, it'd be
helpful to know what your plans are there.

Huh, it never crossed my mind that this would come up...ok, reality. 

Well, my plans - truthfully I'm not sure how my activity will
progressive within the Apache OpenOffice poddling. Presently I'm not
really doing anything there, my intent is to help out some with support
and QA tasks - if I can incorporate that into my schedule in such a way
that my efforts are useful I'll continue and if not quietly remove
myself from the project management committee.

Surely I could expand on my ideas of the two projects but am not at all
certain that would add much to the decision process here - I will add
just this, I don't feel that I would have any problem compartmentalizing
my activities between the two projects and should it arise that there is
some conflict would quickly take steps to resolve it, as needed.

If there are any other concerns on this point please, anyone, feel free
to ask and I will take the time to address them as best I can.

[ ... ]

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.