Re: [steering-discuss] funding for system operations meeting
David Nelson wrote on 2011-08-01 11:05:
I know you work tremendously hard for the project, and you have a lot
of respect and gratitude from me from that, which you know I have
expressed on- and off-list various times. Let me take the chance to
say again that, without your *personal* efforts, this project would
probably fall apart. Literally.
thanks for those kind words, they are really appreciated. I think it's a
great team effort, and everyone contributes a lot to make happen what
happens. It's not only the spokespeople or the SC, but everyone from the
community is doing just amazing and magical things here that really
impress me every day!
No, this is in no way directed towards you personally. Nor do I ever
say that "everything is bad". But that doesn't mean that one should
not point out undesirable tendencies (in a measured and rational
manner) before they get to be ingrained habits.
Of course, any constructive criticism is highly appreciated. It would be
a lie if I said that you are not getting blind over time, when you are
heavily involved in such a project - so feedback from others is indeed
And I do understand that, in a FOSS project, we always have to take
account of people's time limitations. However, when one is managing
the project's key infrastructure as a rather closed group, one does
have a bit of a commitment to especial responsiveness, within
reasonable limits. In any case, it's certainly what I try to apply
with my own piece of infrastructure.
My point is that the sysadmins team is perhaps not developing the
right culture in terms of openness and participation, and that it
would be good to open it up a bit. This is my 2 cents, others may not
see things like that, but...
I only agree partially. I think the sysadmin team is a very special case
for any project. The core group has full root access to all servers, so
it requires a lot of knowledge, trust and and working together. I
consider it highly important that everyone knows the others from face to
face meetings, and that the core group is not too large, out of
organizational and security considerations, but also out of liability
This does not mean, of course, that this core group has to do all the
tasks. We can have SilverStripe and wiki admins, mailing list moderators
and other people working on the infrastructure, but not everyone needs
to be a part of the core group. In other words: A wiki admin does not
need root SSH access to our machines.
What I agree to is that the work of the infrastructure team is not
transparent enough at the moment, and we indeed are working on that. We
plan to have some more information on the team and its work publically
soon, that's something we agreed during that meeting.
However, in some terms, the core group will always be a bit more closed
than the rest of the project, because it needs to out of security
considerations and the special framework they work in. We just cannot
give everyone insight into our systems, that's just too much of a risk.
For that particular meeting, we indeed did not want to have it open. We
wanted to have that core group together. We had lots of things to work
on and discuss, also lots of security-relevant stuff, and there simply
was no time for a "meet and greet the admins".
Talking about you especially, with hosting one of the machines that we
are using, indeed I missed to tell you about that meeting. But if I
remembered to do so, this would not have been done in public anyways,
because that meeting was not meant to be public.
Hope that makes some things a bit clearer. :-)
For the particular questions I could have raised, I'll mail you
off-list. In which case, I perfectly accept that it will take you time
to consider and respond, because I know you have a lot on your plate.
Sure, just drop me a mail and we'll see. You can also mail all the
admins at email@example.com if the mail is intended for
all of them.
We indeed plan to make some senseful contact mechanism available for the
admin team, e.g. we're currently investigating BugZilla and OTRS for that.
However, sometimes things will simply take their time, as we are all
just a group of volunteers doing things in their spare time.
Once again, you definitely should not read all the above posts as any
kind of criticism of you personally. You should probably be aware by
now that I hold your work for the project in very high regard.
Thanks a lot!
Florian Effenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] funding for system operations meeting · Norbert Thiebaud
Re: [steering-discuss] funding for system operations meeting · Tom Davies
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy