Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi :)

In the MS vs TomTom case significant 'damages' were awarded to MS because TomTom 
were using a file-system that could be read by Windows,_USA%29
TomTom 'should' have been paying MS for the privilege of selling a product that 
worked on MS systems.  

The issue about Alfresco is a side-issue.  It's about trying to disrupt 
work-flow and doing so 'behind the back' of the established team-leader.  While 
David & Jean have spent months setting up good work-flow with lots of discussion 
in the team Gary just suddenly decided to throw that out and tell new people to 
use his personal inadequate systems.  The team seems to be re-asserting itself 
now at last.  

The legal issue about screen-shots is more important.  Should we risk using 
stuff that some people that have legal experience or knowledge tell us is risky 
or should we stick to using safer screen-shots that look almost identical 
anyway?  I realise that "almost" is the key-word there but since everyone uses 
different themes and skins it's impossible to make it all identical for 

Regards from
Tom :)
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.