[steering-discuss] Vendor string usage in third-party packages of LibreOffice
I'm a volunteer about to add some packaging scripts for LibreOffice in
pkgsrc , and as such, I asked on the IRC developer's channel if there
was a problem if I used "The Document Foundation" as a vendor string for
the resulting packages.
This is an extract of the exchanges I had on this channel:
11:30 < ftigeot> is there a policy on branding / the --with-vendor option ?
11:33 < ftigeot> would there be a problem if I use "The Document Foundation"
in my packages ?
11:39 * ftigeot has just found
11:40 < ftigeot> I will use The Document Foundation as vendor string
11:40 <@mmeeks> ftigeot: ho hum; if you are not the document foundation -
don't do that.
11:40 <@mmeeks> ftigeot: I think that is the request of the branding
11:40 <@mmeeks> ftigeot: TDF is only for TDF produced builds; LibreOffice is
11:46 < ftigeot> mmeeks: the webpage says "You may use the Marks without prior
written permission (subject to the following terms):
11:46 < ftigeot> 1. To refer to the LibreOffice software in substantially
unmodified form. "
11:47 < ftigeot> with a definition of "substantially unmodified" which says
the way I intend to package it is basically okay
This is an extract of the TradeMark_Policy web page:
You may use the Marks without prior written permission (subject to the
1. To refer to the LibreOffice software in substantially unmodified form.
"Substantially unmodified" means built from the source code provided by TDF,
possibly with minor modifications including but not limited to: the enabling
or disabling of certain features by default, translations into other
languages, changes required for compatibility with a particular operating
system distribution, the inclusion of bug-fix patches, or the bundling of
additional fonts, templates, artwork and extensions).
The packaging scripts I am creating use the unmodified source code of
LibreOffice and only change the default configuration options.
According to the previously mentionned web page, the usage of
"The Document Foundation" trademark is permitted in this case.
According to Michael Meeks, it was not the intent of the Foundation
to allow the usage of its brand in that case.
Could this point be clarified ? If the usage of "The Document Foundation"
trademark is not permitted for creating third-party packages, the information
on the TradeMark_Policy webpage are contradictory.
Thanks in advance for your answers
 pkgsrc - http://www.pkgsrc.org/ - is a framework for building and
packaging third-party software. It was originally created for NetBSD but
is now supported on many systems, including Linux, MacOS X and Microsoft
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- [steering-discuss] Vendor string usage in third-party packages of LibreOffice · Francois Tigeot
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy