Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

Norbert Thiebaud wrote on 2011-04-28 15.31:
not to nit-pick, but I've just re-read the ByLaws, and nothing in
there require member of the ESC to be Member of the Foundation.

my take would indeed to have that requirement that ESC members need to be approved members, out of two reasons:

1. As the ESC has quite a lot of influence, it should ideally be composed of people deeply involved in LibreOffice.

2. We want to have a broad member base. Requiring to be a member in order to be part of the ESC might make the membership more attractive for developers.

As we already have an ESC in place, I guess it should be rather easy to approve the seat holders as members?

Florian

--
Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.