Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I think the date should stay as is. Anything that changes would need to be added as an amendment to the bylaws which were originally created when the TDF started?

On 26/04/2011 20:20, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,

Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-04-26 12.34:
IMHO, it needs updating, with the date moving forward to be more
relevant.

hm... why would this need adaption? I guess the paragraph was meant to support those people who joined us in the early days, i.e. three months after we started TDF and LibreOffice.

Anyone recalls when the bylaws had been finalized in their current state? How much time between this date and December 31st (as mentioned in the bylaws) did people have?

If we approved the bylaws shortly before or even after December 31st, it makes sense to adapt that date, but if not, I'm a bit undetermined, if we need it at all... the rationale behind it was that people joining TDF early would have a "benefit", IMHO.

Florian



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.