Re: [steering-discuss] Suggested blog about MC work and philosophy

André Schnabel wrote (24-04-11 10:46)
> Am 23.04.2011 23:57, schrieb Cor Nouws:

> > the next part is more about the process /merits on which members are
> > accepted. Is it that you want to say that on the one hand not each
> > contribution is a ground for membership and on the other hand the MC
> > will look to all possible contributions when deciding on an application?
>
> Hmm .. not exactly. It is more my point, that we have a list of
> contributions that establish merit. But there are possibly more ways to
> contribute (we cannot even name yet) and the MC will consider those ways
> as well.
>
> Any better words for that?

The words are fine, but I think I get a bit confused by the way you 
connected the two parts. (And the biased interpretation word 'indeed' 
before). I think it is OK to just start a new line with:

Contributing to The Document Foundation/LibreOffice can be .... etc etc

> > >                     And this can be done in various ways. Our bylaws
> > > list some ways to contribute, but this list is not totally fixed. The
> > > Membership Committee will also value other ways to contribute (we
> > > envision that there are many other ways that we even did not think of
> > > yet).
> > >
> > > So - everyone is welcome to contribute and the official membership is
> > > our way to acknowledge these contributions.

Regards,
Cor
--
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org
 - giving openoffice.org its foundation :: The Document Foundation -


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted