Re: [steering-discuss] Add LGPL as license for wiki uploads?
Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2010-12-18 01.29:
I don't know if it should read "and" instead of "or":
The selection is presented to the author of the upload, so she has to
license her work under all the three of them, if she choose this option.
"Or" is for the people using the uploaded content, as they can choose
between the licenses.
1) the text is too long for the selection list
Perhaps you could write:
"CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 / LGPL 3+ / MPL 1.1"
Changed it now to "CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0, and LGPL 3+, and MPL 1.1"
and move the long version to the template?
2) the template showing the license texts (or linking to them) hasn't
been created by now.
Florian Effenberger <email@example.com>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy