Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Michael,

Michael Meeks wrote on 2010-12-16 11.06:

        Ok; we are using the LGPLv3+/MPL dual for code; might be nice to keep
that consistent for artwork too.

        Apart from that it is an excellent idea.

        Presuambly someone needs to tweak the wiki somehow to support this
though (?) - Thorsten ? :-)

I can do it - I just need to know the exact string. At the moment, we have:

CC-by-sa-3.0 = Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported

What would we need in additional and "official" license title?


Florian Effenberger <>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/ @floeff

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.