Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Bernhard,

On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:30 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Would it be reasonable to add LGPL as license to the uploads to the TDF 

        Yes - sounds like a great idea.

At the moment we only allow <no license specified> and <Creative Commons 
Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 Unported>

        The CC commons is at least the Debain compatible v3 one (?)

I'd like to add <LGPL 3.0+> as possible license and could imagine to 
have <CC BY-SA + LGPL> as standard selection.

        Ok; we are using the LGPLv3+/MPL dual for code; might be nice to keep
that consistent for artwork too.

        Apart from that it is an excellent idea.

        Presuambly someone needs to tweak the wiki somehow to support this
though (?) - Thorsten ? :-)



--  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.