On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 22:30 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Would it be reasonable to add LGPL as license to the uploads to the TDF
Yes - sounds like a great idea.
At the moment we only allow <no license specified> and <Creative Commons
Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 Unported>
The CC commons is at least the Debain compatible v3 one (?)
I'd like to add <LGPL 3.0+> as possible license and could imagine to
have <CC BY-SA + LGPL> as standard selection.
Ok; we are using the LGPLv3+/MPL dual for code; might be nice to keep
that consistent for artwork too.
Apart from that it is an excellent idea.
Presuambly someone needs to tweak the wiki somehow to support this
though (?) - Thorsten ? :-)
firstname.lastname@example.org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/steering-discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy