Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Charles, SC guys :-)

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:23, Charles-H. Schulz
<> wrote:
David, as usual, please feel free to review the language... thanks!

Charles-H. Schulz

1) Would it perhaps be useful to add a definition for the term
"community" under section 1.1, Definitions?

2) Would it maybe be better to move the 4 definitions under section 3,
Governance, to section 1.1, Definitions?

I added a lot of reviewer's notes inline in the text because I felt it
would be much easier for you to follow what I was saying. IMHO, the
section on voting, section 5 at the end, needs quite a bit of
attention. I took the liberty of trying to reorganize it somewhat, to
make it clearer and more understandable... In reality, that has kind
of "seeded" places where you might want to do more writing?

I also worked on the format of the doc a bit, and inserted links where
there were cross-references in the text...

Perhaps we might be able to talk about all this in Friday's SC confcall?

HTH. ;-)

David Nelson

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.