[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tdf-test] Order Mail #xxx (was: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 37 (178-182))


Hi Christian, *,

this answers Your mail ordered through
test+get-185@documentfoundation.org

seems to work properly :o))

Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
> <damokles4-listen@bits-fritz.de> wrote:
>> Christian Lohmaier schrieb:

>>> Unfortunately, the digest did not include any base64 encoded
>>> messages this time.

>> strange. Probably this depends the way mails are created by kmail?

> No - just happens that nobody on the test-list did send a message with
> base64 encoding - has nothing to do with digest vs regular
> subscription.

The mails in question sent by me were not sent base64 encoded! This was
aparently done by one of the machines underway. This doesn't "work"
anymore for whatever reason.

>> If so this one should be base64 encoded as well.

> Nope
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

One more "strange" here..

>>> So all I can say is that gmail is unsuitable for handling
>>> digest-subscription, as it displays all messages inline. It's not
>>> possible to reply to the single message (well, at least not if you
>>> want to preserve a thread.

>> That's not good news.

> Well - not really bad news either, as I really don't see a single
> reason for doing a digest-subscription with gmail. for a discussion
> list (i.e. one where you don't only receive stuff, but also interact
> with others.

That's not the question :o). It *is* done even if not reasonable at all
;o)).

[..]

> It's a weak spot of gmail that you cannot reply to a single mail, but
> on the plus side it doesn't have any problem properly displaying the
> messges with various different encodings (utf-8 and 8bit encoding (the
> message-list from the maling list system, latin1 and latin9,
> quoted-printabl from the postings) inline (and I'm pretty sure that it
> won't have problem wih base64 ones either, just that I could not
> verify that yet.

>> [no individual reply with gmail possible]
>> which isn't very useful at all..

again: beeing reasonable is not the question..

> Yes. And even if the user would change the subject, it would still
> cause a new thread, as no references are kept... (also not when using
> plain subscription, it's a general "feature" of gmail to start a new
> thread when you change the subject. The only think I dislike about
> gmail really.

.. and the fact it spares You your own listreplies ;o))

Gruß/regards
--
Friedrich
Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/
LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to test+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

References:
Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 37 (178-182)Friedrich Strohmaier <damokles4-listen@bits-fritz.de>
Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of test@documentfoundation.org issue 37 (178-182)Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.