[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of firstname.lastname@example.org issue 37 (178-182)
- Subject: Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of email@example.com issue 37 (178-182)
- From: Friedrich Strohmaier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 20:32:19 +0200
- To: email@example.com
Hi Christian, *,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
> Unfortunately, the digest did not include any base64 encoded messages
> this time.
strange. Probably this depends the way mails are created by kmail?
If so this one should be base64 encoded as well.
> So all I can say is that gmail is unsuitable for handling
> digest-subscription, as it displays all messages inline. It's not
> possible to reply to the single message (well, at least not if you
> want to preserve a thread.
That's not good news.
> The only way to preserve a thread would be to request a single message
> (using the get<number> mailinglist command (I remember Friedrich and
> Florian did wonder where the message-numbers are used at all) and use
> that single message as basis for the reply, but no user will do that)
but it's indeed a way for those replying only seldomly.
> - on the other hand, gmail users will very likely not use
> digest-subscription (as there just is no need for this, if you don't
> want to follow a thread, you can mute it and won't be bothered with
> mail of the same thread.
> The message itself is a multipart/digest one, with correctly delimited
> messages and complete headers (also including the mail-archive.com
> one) for each single mail - so "real" mailclients that don't handle
> those properly/cannot even display the messages are buggy as hell and
> don't deserve the name.
You talk about gmail?? ;o))
> So again: Only problem with gmail is that it doesn't show them as
> individual messages, but shows them all inline, in one message.
> For reference/Documentation purposes a fullquote of the digest-mail as
> received/displayed/what you get when you use reply in gmail without
which isn't very useful at all..
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 4:00 PM, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Topics (messages 178 through 182):
Thanks for investigating
LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/test/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of firstname.lastname@example.org issue 37 (178-182)||Christian Lohmaier <email@example.com>|
|[tdf-test] Re: Digest of firstname.lastname@example.org issue 37 (178-182)||Christian Lohmaier <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of firstname.lastname@example.org issue 37 (178-182)
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of email@example.com issue 37 (178-182)
- Previous by thread: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of firstname.lastname@example.org issue 37 (178-182)
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-test] Re: Digest of email@example.com issue 37 (178-182)