Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


No, there is no technical reason why I would like to have the new 1.3.3 version. This 
'official' version would just create a clear situation, everybody would know exactly what 
is inluded. People don't know what fixes these patches cover, they only see that there is an 
outdated version!
"Caolán McNamara" <caolanm@redhat.com> írta:
On Sun, 2014-07-13 at 17:19 +0200, penttila wrote:
Hi, A new Hunspell version (1.3.3) is out since 2014 Jun 2, after more
than three years of development containing several bug fixes.  
(http://hunspell.sourceforge.net)Will this new version be inluded in
the upcomming LibreOffice 4.3?

I can see that its still 1.3.2 in 4-3, but with 9 additional patches
over the "vanilla" 1.3.2, so if there&#39;s a particular problem in 1.3.2
which makes you want to have 1.3.3 instead then it may already be
covered by one of those backports.

C.





-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscribe@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.