[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice priorities
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice priorities
- From: Cor Nouws <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 08:50:16 +0200
- To: email@example.com
hi Pedro, all,
Pedro wrote (17-05-12 12:28)
IMHO after several releases it is possibly time to slow down a bit and
concentrate on Quality instead of Quantity...
A suggested contradiction between quality and new functions is an artificial (which has been explained over and again ;-) and has been the case ever since OpenOffice.org 1.0.1, and will be the case too in other projects based on the old OpenOffice.org code, once things start to happen there..)
Apart from that: people concerned in improving quality, for which there always is place, make sure they contribute to QA and e.g. use the QA mailing list.
One of the most important items is helping that problems that are found/ reported, are clearly visible in true context, so that nasty regressions are marked and recognised as such, thus that developers can jump on them asap :-)
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|[tdf-discuss] LibreOffice priorities||Pedro <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: [tdf-discuss] FYI, LibreOffice membership
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice priorities
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice priorities
- Next by thread: [tdf-discuss] IBM plans to contribute the Symphony code to Apache OpenOffice, soon.