[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?
- From: RGB ES <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 22:58:37 +0100
- To: email@example.com
I was thinking on something similar. If it were possible to completely
separate "core" from UI it would be great. For example, someone who
knows Qt but nothing about GTK will be able to create a gui for MeeGo
without messing with core elements. Or someone else will be able to
build a gui for small monitors. Or another person will be able to
build something for "power users" in which you can only see style
stuff while just another person will contribute a kids & format
painter lovers interface.
To go on with this idea, I think it will be interesting to make the
core "toolkit independent" (i.e., pure C or C++, without GTK or any
stuff like that), so it will be possible to integrate LibO on any
platform "just" (yes, I know it is not easy, that's why I used
quotes... ;) ) by writing a proper UI.
2010/11/6 Lee Hyde <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Greetings All,
> I'm just a humble end user, and frankly I have little-to-no knowledge of
> software development but I was wondering whether there is a clear
> separation between frontend and backend with LibreOffice. Such that it
> would make it easy to essentially 'slot-in' a replacement GUI.
> As I say, I'm not familiar with software development in general much
> less the specifics of OOo/LibO but it seems to the that one of the
> better ways to encourage innovation is to make it easy for people to
> 'hack' on individual modules and in particular the GUI (which is in dire
> need of modernisation and optimisation in my humble opinion). If
> 'hacking' a new GUI onto OOo/Lib (a'la IBM Lotus Symphony) at the moment
> is non-trivial it will hinder innovation in the form of specialist forks
> (which could be very useful for the mother project) and/or experimental
> UI (which are clearly intended to showcase innovative ideas to see if
> they could or should be merged into the mother project).
> I just thought I'd bring this up in light of all the discussion
> regarding UI reform. Of course I could be way off base here, and if I am
> please do set me straight; if I need some edumacating regarding the
> state of OOo/LibO do edumacatify me!
> Lee Hyde.
> P.S. The quote in my signature was chosen at random, rather appropriate
> though don't you think?
> "There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?"
> -- Dr. Jonas Stalk, on being asked who owned the patent for his polio vaccine
> Unsubscribe instructions: Email to email@example.com
> Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?||Jesús Corrius <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?||"Alexandro Colorado" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|[tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?||Lee Hyde <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Where is the right place for discussing new features?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Clear separation between frontend and backend?