[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build
- From: "T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:11:19 -0500
- To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
I'm agreeing with you that Windows is the dominant market and should be
treated as such.
However, in developing countries Android tablets may be the most accessible
and affordable computing platform of the future. It shouldn't be ignored.
I'd contend the priority should be on the primary platforms:
Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Next should be platforms of the future.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Peter Rodwell <peter@intorg.org> wrote:
> Quoting T. J. Brumfield:
>
> In all fairness, Android tablets could become a large emerging market, but
>> Windows is still by far the predominant market.
>>
>
> But how many people will use them for heavy-duty word processing,
> spreadsheeting and presenting? LO/OO is a heavy-duty package for
> heavy-duty work, after all.
>
> I've tried typing on my stepson's iPad (on the couple of occasions
> when I've been able to prise it from his grip) and it's hopeless.
> OK for Web surfing, short e-mails, etc, but tablet ergonomics are
> completely unsuited for serious work. Even laptops are dubious
> (nasty keyboards, small screens, etc).
>
>
> P.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
> Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
>
>
--
"I'm questioning my education
Rewind and what does it show?
Could be, the truth it becomes you
I'm a seed, wondering why it grows"
-- Pearl Jam, Education
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build | Peter Rodwell <peter@intorg.org> |
| [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build | e-letter <inpost@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build | Peter Rodwell <peter@intorg.org> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build | "T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build | Peter Rodwell <peter@intorg.org> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: x86_64 Windows build
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.