[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build
- From: "T. J. Brumfield" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:21:34 -0500
- To: email@example.com
I do understand it isn't simply just a matter of compiling a 64-bit build.
Knowing that it is on the TODO list is good enough for me!
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Andras Timar <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> 2010/11/4 Frank Esposito <email@example.com>:
> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:36 AM, T. J. Brumfield <firstname.lastname@example.org
> >> There is an open OOo bug that is over 5 years old.
> >> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
> >> It seems that OOo developers felt this was an unnecessary feature.
> >> as users have commented in that bug report, the 32-bit version doesn't
> >> in 64-bit Terminal Servers, and Microsoft does not ship a 32-bit server
> >> product anymore. Furthermore, Base can not connect to a 64-bit ODBC data
> >> source.
> >> Given that Microsoft has been shipping 64-bit operating systems for 7
> >> now, and that there are legitimate use cases where OOo/LibO can't fufil
> >> user
> >> needs without a 64-bit Windows build, shouldn't this be reevaluated?
> >> And from a pure perception standpoint, it looks like OOo/LibO is behind
> >> Office in this regard, given that MS Office offers a 64-bit version.
> >> Thanks!
> > +2 for 64-bit builds
> It is on the TODO list. It needs some porting efforts, however. It is
> not as simple as recompiling the source code with a 64-bit compiler.
> Unsubscribe instructions: Email to email@example.com<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
> Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
|[tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build||"T. J. Brumfield" <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build||Frank Esposito <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build||Andras Timar <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice UI should be tweaked, not reinvented
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] x86_64 Windows build
- Next by thread: [tdf-discuss] Re: unable to reply quickly to mailing list posts