[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation
- From: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 07:38:14 -0400
- To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 17:28 +0100, Roberto Resoli wrote:
> Copyright Assignment is nor bad nor good, it's a compromise
I do not see assignment in -any- way as a compromise; but as an
un-necessary extreme.
> i am still waiting to see any reply also to Andrea's proposals
> in another thread [1]
Oh - I guess I should reply there.
> I agree with Andrea, and I think that all this JCA stuff need a more
> pragmatic approach
Honestly; the amount of doom mongering in this thread is staggering.
Suddenly we somehow 'discovered' that all FLOSS licenses are
un-enforceable, jurisdictionless, that no-one has really contributed
anything, in any binding way to any eclectically owned FLOSS project[1],
and that only mad people would ship that software :-)
If the rational conclusion of these arguments is that the Linux Kernel,
Mozilla, SAMBA, GNOME, KDE, and by extension -all- Linux distributions
are fundamentally unsafe to ship - then we have a huge and un-fixable
problem; but one that is by far beyond the scope of LibreOffice to fix.
In particular OpenOffice already has this problem, since it includes
big chunks of Mozilla - which has some form of mild certification of
authenticity - but this only extends to the person doing the committing,
not the code they commit [ from others ] ;-) ie. it is eclectically
owned, and there is no paperwork, or click-through before contributing.
So at this point, there are two options:
* throw up arms in dismay, conclude nothing is 'safe', and
wander around desparately trying to aggregate stronger
rights to the entire codebase in various organisations
[ which IMHO aggregates problems with it ].
Or:
* follow the rest of the world including eg. IBM (who are not
short of lawyers) who already ship eg. Mozilla, SAMBA and
Linux without any of these apparently indispensible
assignments
;-)
HTH,
Michael.
[1] - eclectically owned projects are, by far, the vast majority of Free
Software projects.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | Roberto Resoli <roberto.resoli@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | BRM <bm_witness@yahoo.com> |
| [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@openoffice.org> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@openoffice.org> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation | Roberto Resoli <roberto.resoli@gmail.com> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.