[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
- From: timofonic timofonic <timofonic@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:27:45 +0000
- To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
+5 too.
What about supporting more languages for extensions instead? Lua seems
interesting, there are other languages that couldbe supported too.
I think LibO should be completely functional with all the features
without the use of heavy dependencies like JVM.
Also I think LibO should concentrate on being a lot more resource
efficient without losing functionalities. This way slower machines
will be able to run it like netbooks, mobile devices and specially
those using ARM.
Regards.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:16 AM, shundread@gmail.com <shundread@gmail.com> wrote:
> +4 on making Java optional. Personally, I prefer Python for writing
> extensions to programs as it usually results in smaller code and less
> legal uncertainty. Do we / Can we have the option of making LibO
> extensions in Python?
>
> -Thiago
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:19 AM, jonathon <toki.kantoor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/03/2010 12:08 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>>
>>>> + Base HSQLDB backend
>>
>>> That would mean: ship a different database with by default,
>>
>> SQLite could easily be added.
>>
>>> would still need that backend otherwise you'd introduce a major incompatibility with previous versions.
>>
>> Doesn't Base have its own independent database engine. Something that
>> is not part of OOo/LibO? If so, then a connector for it would be all
>> that is required to retain the ability to use databases created for it.
>>
>>> I don't really see a chance for base unless you want to duplicate base.
>>
>> Base as the front end could be rewritten.
>>
>>> (Yes, I personally do like java, and I'd not create a code-heavy extension in any other language without a good reason)
>>
>> Keep the ability for extensions to be written in Java.
>>
>> jonathon
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAkzQ4toACgkQaC1raifmCuGH8ACeJIUHtBv5gUswkAkv/Z8Lmvam
>> TpUAnijSa79TisTGN1if8p8aLoVza3AS
>> =obwl
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> --
>> Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
>> Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
>> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
>> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
>>
>>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
>
>
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com> |
| [tdf-discuss] Java dependency | "T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Java dependency | jonathon <toki.kantoor@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Java dependency | Johannes Bausch <johannes.bausch@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Java dependency | Frank Esposito <frankesposito@gmail.com> |
| [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | "Mirek M." <mazelm@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | "T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | Cedric Bosdonnat <cedric.bosdonnat.ooo@free.fr> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | jonathon <toki.kantoor@gmail.com> |
| Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency | "shundread@gmail.com" <shundread@gmail.com> |
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Copyright Assignments & the Document Foundation
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
- Index(es):
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.