[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure
- From: Andrea Pescetti <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:46:59 +0200
- To: email@example.com
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I'd prefer if we do the 3.3 release in a somewhat lightweight
As I understood from an earlier message of yours, LibreOffice 3.3 will be heavily based on OOo 3.3 and I thus agree with the "lightweight testing".
the OpenOffice.org QA project has things like QATrack,
QUASTe, and TCM - but I wonder which of those pass the test of "we
really need it
I actually believe that these are fundamental tools to assess quality of a build, and that insufficient testing could mean that LibreOffice is doomed to be "the nicer but more buggy brother of OOo" forever in the public opinion.
At least, I recommend that new tests are written for any LibreOffice specific functionality, that we have a tool to track them (kind of TCM) and a tool to track releases (QATrack being the natural candidate here).
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
|Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure||Caio Tiago Oliveira <email@example.com>|
|[tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure||Thorsten Behrens <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Document Foundation - list archive - emails in clear
- Next by Date: Re: [tdf-discuss] Document Foundation - list archive - emails in clear
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] QA Infrastructure