[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?
- Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?
- From: Marc Paré <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:32:18 -0400
- To: email@example.com
Le 2010-10-07 06:11, Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2010-10-07 03:21, Andre Schnabel a écrit :
Von: Florian Effenberger<firstname.lastname@example.org>
Am 07.10.2010 um 08:23 schrieb Jean Hollis Weber:
Is it possible to shorten this prefix on emails from the Documentation
mailing list? [libreoffice-documentation]
someone asked to have a longer prefix -- initially it was
libo-documentation. Cc'ng André, who might have more insight. I want
to have it consistent
amongst all lists, but am open for the shorter version also.
When we startet the l10n list, I got request to change from
"libo-l10n" to "libreoffice-l10n" . To apply this rule to the
documentation list, we should use "libreoffice-doc".
So, general rule would be: "libreoffice-"<short name of topic>
But I don't stick on that, as long as we do not change it every day :)
If you are going to re-organise the nomenclature and apply localization,
may I suggest that for country and language designation you follow the
ISO standard. As LibO is using an ISO standard document format, it would
then stand to reason to follow and promote ISO standards.
The ISO country-code standard can be found here:
The ISO language-code standard can be found here:
* SIL is the caretaker of the ISO language-code standard and has
formulated over the years 3 code conventions. In order to circumvent the
ISO country-code designation, I would suggest the SIL language-code 3
digit standard be adopted (almost all of the world's languages have been
In using the ISO standard, LibO would be standing behind the ISO
standard that sets the convention for its document format. This will
legitimize even more the ISO standard.
I also think that the LibO should also take part in the ISO steering
committees on document format as it's interest in a properly run ISO
organization as well as a well-documented document format is in its core
interest. It is what differentiates the LibO suite from the other
non-compliant document format suites.
Just to add that you may find additionally the date convention here too. This page lists the most sought-for ISO convention pages:
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to email@example.com
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
|[tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?||Jean Hollis Weber <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?||Florian Effenberger <email@example.com>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?||"Andre Schnabel" <Andre.Schnabel@gmx.net>|
|Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?||Marc Paré <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
- Prev by Date: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOfficeForum.org is now functioning
- Next by Date: [tdf-discuss] I like the name LibreOffice
- Previous by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?
- Next by thread: Re: [tdf-discuss] Shorter mailing list prefix?